Computing the area of a thin triangle

Heron’s formula computes the area of a triangle given the length of each side.

where If you have a very thin triangle, one where two of the sides approximately equal s and the third side is much shorter, a direct implementation Heron’s formula may not be accurate.

The cardinal rule of numerical programming is to avoid subtracting nearly equal numbers, and that’s exactly what Heron’s formula does if s is approximately equal to two of the sides, say a and b.

William Kahan’s formula is algebraically equivalent to Heron’s formula, but is more accurate in floating point arithmetic.

His procedure is to first sort the sides in decreasing order, then compute You can find this method, for example, in Nick Higham’s book Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms.

The algebraically redundant parentheses in the expression above are not numerically redundant.

As we’ll demonstrate below, the method is less accurate without them.

Optimizing compilers respect the parentheses: the results are the same when the code below is compiled with gcc with no optimization (-O0) and with aggressive optimization (-O3).

The same is true of Visual Studio in Debug and Release mode.

C code demo First, here is a straight-forward implementation of Heron #include <math.

h> float heron1(float a, float b, float c) { float s = 0.

5 * (a + b + c); return sqrt(s*(s – a)*(s – b)*(s – c)); } And here’s an implementation of Kahan’s version.

void swap(float* a, float* b) { float t = *b; *b = *a; *a = t; } float heron2(float a, float b, float c) { // Sort a, b, c into descending order if (a < b) swap(&a, &b); if (b < c) swap(&b, &c); if (a < c) swap(&a, &c); float p = (a + (b + c))*(c – (a – b))*(c + (a – b))*(a + (b – c)); return 0.

25*sqrt(p); } Finally, here’s an incorrect implementation of Kahan’s method, with “unnecessary” parentheses removed.

float heron3(float a, float b, float c) { // Sort a, b, c into descending order if (a < b) swap(&a, &b); if (b < c) swap(&b, &c); if (a < c) swap(&a, &c); float p = (a + b + c)*(c – (a – b))*(c + a – b)*(a + b – c); return 0.

25*sqrt(p); } Now we call all three methods.

int main() { float a = 100000.

1, b = 100000.

2, c = 0.

3; printf(“%0.

“, heron1(a, b, c)); printf(“%0.

“, heron2(a, b, c)); printf(“%0.

“, heron3(a, b, c)); } And for a gold standard, here is an implementation in bc with 40 decimal place precision.

scale = 40 a = 10000000.

01 b = 10000000.

02 c = 0.

03 s = 0.

5*(a + b + c) sqrt(s*(s-a)*(s-b)*(s-c)) Here are the outputs of the various methods, in order of increasing accuracy.

Heron: 14363.

129 Naive: 14059.

268 Kahan: 14114.

293 bc: 14142.

157 Here “naive” means the incorrect implementation of Kahan’s method, heron3 above.

The bc result had many more decimals but was rounded to the same precision as the C results.

Related post: How to compute the area of a polygon.

Leave a Reply