Predicting Hotel Cancellations with ExtraTreesClassifier and Logistic Regression

Predicting Hotel Cancellations with ExtraTreesClassifier and Logistic RegressionMichael Grogan (MGCodesandStats)BlockedUnblockFollowFollowingMay 16Hotel cancellations can cause issues for managers.

Not only is there the lost revenue as a result of the customer cancelling, but this can also cause difficulty in coordinating bookings and adjusting revenue management practices.

Data analytics can help to overcome this issue, in terms of identifying the customers who are most likely to cancel — allowing a hotel chain to adjust its marketing strategy accordingly.

To investigate how machine learning can aid in this task, I decided to generate a logistic regression in Python to determine whether cancellations can be accurately predicted with this model.

The Algarve Hotel dataset available from Science Direct was used for this analysis.

Data ProcessingFirstly, the relevant libraries were imported and the relevant data type for each variable was classified:import osimport csvimport randomimport statsmodels.

api as smimport statsmodels.


api as smfimport numpy as npimport pandas as pdfrom sklearn.

model_selection import train_test_splitfrom sklearn.

linear_model import LogisticRegressionfrom sklearn.

ensemble import ExtraTreesClassifierfrom sklearn.

preprocessing import MinMaxScalerdtypes = { 'IsCanceled': 'float64', 'LeadTime': 'float64', 'StaysInWeekendNights': 'float64', 'StaysInWeekNights': 'float64', 'Adults': 'float64', 'Children': 'float64', 'Babies': 'float64', 'Meal': 'category', 'Country': 'category', 'MarketSegment': 'category', 'DistributionChannel': 'category', 'IsRepeatedGuest': 'float64', 'PreviousCancellations': 'float64', 'PreviousBookingsNotCanceled': 'float64', 'ReservedRoomType': 'category', 'AssignedRoomType': 'category', 'BookingChanges': 'float64', 'DepositType': 'category', 'Agent': 'category', 'Company': 'category', 'DaysInWaitingList': 'float64', 'CustomerType': 'category', 'ADR': 'float64', 'RequiredCarParkingSpaces': 'float64', 'TotalOfSpecialRequests': 'float64', 'ReservationStatus': 'category' }As we can see, there are many variables that can potentially influence whether a customer is going to cancel or not, and not all of these variables will necessarily be relevant in determining this.

The data is imported, and then the data is factorized so as to express the categories in numerical format:train_df = pd.


csv', dtype=dtypes)a=train_df.


apply(lambda col: pd.

factorize(col, sort=True)[0])dataThe variables are then stacked together under the numpy format:IsCanceled = data['IsCanceled']y = IsCanceledleadtime = data['LeadTime'] #1staysweekendnights = data['StaysInWeekendNights'] #2staysweeknights = data['StaysInWeekNights'] #3adults = data['Adults'] #4children = data['Children'] #5babies = data['Babies'] #6meal = data['Meal'] #7country = data['Country'] #8marketsegment = data['MarketSegment'] #9distributionchannel = data['DistributionChannel'] #10isrepeatedguest = data['IsRepeatedGuest'] #11previouscancellations = data['PreviousCancellations'] #12previousbookingsnotcanceled = data['PreviousBookingsNotCanceled'] #13reservedroomtype = data['ReservedRoomType'] #14assignedroomtype = data['AssignedRoomType'] #15bookingchanges = data['BookingChanges'] #16deptype = data['DepositType'] #17agent = data['Agent'] #18company = data['Company'] #19dayswaitinglist = data['DaysInWaitingList'] #20custype = data['CustomerType'] #21adr = data['ADR'] #22rcps = data['RequiredCarParkingSpaces'] #23totalsqr = data['TotalOfSpecialRequests'] #24reserv = data['ReservationStatus'] #25x = np.

column_stack((leadtime,staysweekendnights,staysweeknights,adults,children,babies,meal,country,marketsegment,distributionchannel,isrepeatedguest,previouscancellations,previousbookingsnotcanceled,reservedroomtype,assignedroomtype,bookingchanges,deptype,agent,company,dayswaitinglist,custype,adr,rcps,totalsqr,reserv))x = sm.

add_constant(x, prepend=True)y=y.

valuesExtra Trees ClassifierAs mentioned, there are many variables included in the analysis — not all of them will be relevant in determining whether a customer is likely to cancel or not.

To solve this issue, the Extra Trees Classifier is used to print the importance of each variable in numerical format, and the variables with the highest ranked importance are then chosen accordingly.

from sklearn.

ensemble import ExtraTreesClassifiermodel = ExtraTreesClassifier()model.

fit(x, y)print(model.

feature_importances_)Here are the generated readings:[0.

00000000e+00 2.

80773623e-02 2.

87638739e-03 5.

72799343e-03 1.

72631728e-03 1.

64816050e-03 2.

23887272e-04 2.

59074686e-03 3.

76929953e-02 2.

09040742e-02 3.

63074785e-03 3.

40060409e-03 9.

81971773e-03 5.

64723064e-04 3.

11625309e-03 8.

50316994e-03 4.

42794922e-03 4.

86811986e-02 4.

81089533e-03 1.

07322025e-03 8.

82583550e-04 8.

32794531e-03 8.

61034596e-03 1.

97387302e-02 6.

70055352e-03 7.

66243438e-01]From the above, the identified features of importance are lead time, country, market segment, deposit type, customer type, and reservation status.

The variables are redefined in the stack:y1 = yx1 = np.

column_stack((leadtime,country,marketsegment,deptype,custype,reserv))x1 = sm.

add_constant(x1, prepend=True)Logistic RegressionNow, the logistic regression is generated:x1_train, x1_test, y1_train, y1_test = train_test_split(x1, y1, random_state=0)logreg = LogisticRegression().

fit(x1_train,y1_train)logregprint("Training set score: {:.



score(x1_train,y1_train)))print("Test set score: {:.



score(x1_test,y1_test)))import statsmodels.

api as smlogit_model=sm.



summary())Here are the results:Training set score: 0.

993Test set score: 0.

992Optimization terminated successfully.

Current function value: 0.

100929 Iterations 8 Logit Regression Results ==============================================================================Dep.

Variable: y No.

Observations: 40058Model: Logit Df Residuals: 40051Method: MLE Df Model: 6Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 Pseudo R-squ.

: 0.

8291Time: 19:05:49 Log-Likelihood: -4043.

0converged: True LL-Null: -23662.

LLR p-value: 0.

000============================================================================== coef std err z P>|z| [0.

025 0.

975]——————————————————————————const 1.

5074 0.

214 7.

029 0.

000 1.

087 1.

928×1 0.

0014 0.

000 3.

706 0.

000 0.

001 0.

002×2 0.

0184 0.

001 14.

251 0.

000 0.

016 0.

021×3 0.

1697 0.

027 6.

223 0.

000 0.

116 0.

223×4 1.

1369 0.

125 9.

090 0.

000 0.

892 1.

382×5 -0.

0812 0.

060 -1.

345 0.

179 -0.

199 0.

037×6 -7.

2326 0.

075 -96.

874 0.

000 -7.

379 -7.

086==============================================================================Now, the logistic regression is used to predict cancellations for the test data, and a confusion matrix is generated to determine the incidence of true/false positives and negatives:pr = logreg.

predict(x1_test)from sklearn.

metrics import classification_report,confusion_matrixprint(confusion_matrix(y1_test,pr))print(classification_report(y1_test,pr))The confusion matrix is generated:[[7267 0] [ 76 2672]] precision recall f1-score support 0 0.

99 1.

00 0.

99 7267 1 1.

00 0.

97 0.

99 2748 micro avg 0.

99 0.

99 0.

99 10015 macro avg 0.

99 0.

99 0.

99 10015weighted avg 0.

99 0.

99 0.

99 10015From the above, we see that the accuracy in classification was quite high.

Here is an ROC curve illustrating the true vs false positive rate.

import matplotlib.

pyplot as pltfrom sklearn.

metrics import roc_curvefalsepos,truepos,thresholds=roc_curve(y1_test,logreg.



xlabel("False Positive Rate")plt.

ylabel("True Positive Rate")cutoff=np.




show()Testing against unseen dataWhen importing the H1.

csv dataset, I decided to remove two random rows from the analysis.

The reason for this is to use the generated logistic regression in order to determine how the model would work in predicting unseen instances.

A constant 1.

5074 is used (as was generated in the regression output), as well as the values for the relevant variables.

Cancellation# leadtime, country, marketsegment, deptype, custype, reserv#Cancellationbx1 = np.


5074,42,91,5,0,2,0))bx1 = sm.

add_constant(bx1, prepend=True)bx1pre1 = logreg.

predict(bx1)pre1Result:array([1])No cancellation# leadtime, country, marketsegment, deptype, custype, reserv#No cancellationbx2 = np.


5074,38,91,5,0,2,1))bx2 = sm.

add_constant(bx2, prepend=True)bx2pre2 = logreg.

predict(bx2)pre2Resultarray([0])In this instance, we can see that the logistic regression correctly predicted the outcome for these two separate customers.

Let’s come up with a probability for these two same customers.

Odds of not cancelling# Odds of not cancellingsum1=1.









035178771854560434Odds of cancelling# Odds of cancellingsum2=1.









9806723178783029We see that the probability of cancellation for the customer that did not cancel was 3.

5%, while the probability for the customer that did indeed cancel was 98%.

This illustrates that the logistic regression was adept at predicting whether or not a cancellation would occur for these two customers.

ConclusionThis has been an illustration of how a logistic regression can be used to predict hotel cancellations.

We have also seen how the Extra Trees Classifier can be used as a feature selection tool to identify the most reliable predictors of customer cancellations.

Many thanks for your time, and if you are interested in exploring this further you can find the full code source at my GitHub profile.

.. More details

Leave a Reply