On Building Effective Data Science Teams

On Building Effective Data Science TeamsSaurav DhunganaBlockedUnblockFollowFollowingJan 31As Data Science and AI make their way into almost every industries under the sun, so do the challenges of building a team capable of building sucessful AI projects.

The demand for that archetypical “Data Scientist” who is the perfect blend of a statistician, programmer and communicator has never been greater.

But as the dust settles, we have started hearing stories of failed projects and disenchanted professionals.

Many people tend think Data Science as a new field, and expect it to have growing pains as it becomes mainstream.

You may have heard of expensively assembled teams of experts fail time after time.

As a data science consultant who has worked in various industries, I’ve had the chance to see this trend firsthand.

This is my attempt to reflect on the qualities that make a successful data team though my own experiences and help business leaders and executives create better AI strategies.

Don’t Forget Your RootsTo begin with we need to think of Data Science as the natural evolution of existing disciplines rather than an entirely new one.

After all, we’ve been working with data before the computer age began, and the concept of AI has been around since at least the 1960s.

Other disciplines like Knowledge Discovery from Databases, Decision Support Systems, Business Intelligence, Data Mining, Analytics, Predictive Analytics etc.

have been around for a long time.

The main goal of each of them is to extract meaningful patterns from data and use that to gain insights and make decisions for the future.

Data Science is the latest incarnation of this trend that was enabled by massive increase in the amount and variety data available to us in the internet age.

It is further fueled by the availability of relatively cheap computational power and new breakthroughs in machine-learning algorithms that can make use of this abundant data.

The increased complexity and mathematical sophistication of these new algorithms then created a sudden need for people with advanced degrees who could comprehend them and thus the AI race had begun.

But despite the apparent novelty of this technology, it is my firm belief that there is much we can learn from mythologies and best practices followed in older disciplines.

CRISP-DMThe most obvious and often overlooked tool is the CRISP-DM standard.

It is an industrial process for structuring your analytics projects that has been around since the 1990s.

The main idea is to divide an analytics project into a number of clearly defined phases.

These are — Business understanding, Data understanding, Data preparation, Modeling, Evaluation, and Deployment.

Photo: LuminusAlthough this process had some shortcomings and the standard hasn’t been updated recently, the six phases are still useful.

In my view every data professional should read and understand these phases to be truly effective.

The Team Data Science Process (TDSP)Data Science is a fundamentally iterative process and the main drawback of CRISP-DM is that it doesn’t incorporate this that well.

TDSP is a modern data science lifecycle process from Microsoft that improves on the older methods.

Think of it as what happens when the CRISP-DM gets an agile development makeover tailored in the age of cloud-based processing.

Photo: MicrosoftYour company may have its own tailored process based on what you do, but it really helps to know about these foundational processes.

The secret ingredient?OK, this was a bit of a trick question.

I’ve seen companies often get caught up with having the latest and greatest algorithms and computing processors, while taking the data for granted.

We may have plenty of data available, but the quality of that data isn’t a given.

Good data is still hard to collect, and hence can be the main competitive advantage you could have.

The best algorithm cannot guarantee good models unless you feed it good data.

As they say — Garbage in, Garbage out.

One of the most overlooked aspects of AI is that most of algorithms are available free of code via open source software or through cloud providers at very low cost.

In a way AI algorithms have been commoditized through these libraries and services.

Of course, you need people skilled in the art of working with data and developing solutions from it.

My advice is to first break your data science roadmap into simple, use-cases that everyone agrees on and achievable in single-digit number of weeks.

Also make sure that the data is obtainable, ROI and/or deliverables is clearly defined and the data team is following an iterative execution process.

After you’ve had learned from a few of these cycles, you will be much better positioned to take on more complex and riskier use-cases.

The A-teamNow that we’ve looked at how we can think of planning our Data Science projects, I want to talk about creating a data team to execute on that.

I’m not going to delve into where to hire or how the hiring process should be, but what the team composition should be.

Photo: Hudson UKAs I eluded to in the beginning of this article, there is much confusion over what a Data Scientist is or does.

Given the prestige associated with that job title, anyone whose job has ever been to work with some data seems to have that it in their CVs.

I think it’s time to move on from that and have specialized titles based on what people actually do.

Just like we don’t expect a doctor to know every medical procedure or diagnosis, we shouldn’t expect someone to master everything in the AI either.

We must have specialists who know the boundaries of their skillsets and responsibilities and can work with others to get the job done.

Of course this doesn’t mean there aren’t people who excel at multiple areas or are generalists, just like we have GPs in medicine.

Data science is for the most part a team sport.

Photo: Business ScienceSince, data is the most essential ingredient of any data science strategy the first people you need are Data Engineers.

A data engineer is generally someone with good programming and hardware skills, and who can be build your data infrastructure.

It depends on the size of your data but they are generally comfortable working with big data and cloud technologies, know how to build data pipelines, design databases, and pull data out of them.

They will know how to do look at the data at a basic level, and monitoring of this data but are not necessarily experts in analyzing it.

After you’ve built out your data infrastructure and you will need people who can take that data, clean it, analyze it, run experiments on it and communicate the results.

Depending on your business requirements the exact skills varies.

Most of the time this work is done by Data Analysts who are skilled in the processing and cleaning data, creating statistical inference or predictive models, running experiments, plotting those results, creating reports and providing insights to stakeholders higher up.

They’ll mostly be working in Jupyter notebook or Rstudio, and have a combination of programming, statistics and machine learning knowledge.

We shouldn’t expect them to write production quality code though.

That brings me to the next role.

If you are building a data product you will need Machine Learning Engineers in your team.

These are not researchers who build machine learning algorithms per se but are data-focused software developers familiar with various data science libraries and know how to write production quality code based on the models developed by the analysts.

To do this job they must work closely with Data Engineers, or it might be also done by a math savvy Data Engineer for smaller teams.

Most developers looking to enter the data science field should consider this as a good career option.

Sometimes it might also be useful to have a more design-focused Data Visualization Specialist to create highly polished charts and reports to communicate the results of the analysis.

I tend to think of a Data Scientist as someone who is above average in all of the aforementioned roles, and also who knows how to work with the Domain Experts to deliver results.

These are collaborators generally outside your team or organization that you bring in to leverage their expertise in cases such as medicine, finance, economics, marketing etc.

If you are working on problems that require some custom or proprietary data science algorithms, it might then be time to hire someone with a PhD or core research background.

They’ll probably have a deep understanding of the theory and algorithms behind an AI field like Conversational AI, Computer Vision, Robotics, Reinforcement Learning, Bayesian Statistics etc.

I tend to like the title Research Engineer or Research Scientist for a role like this.

Another important but less talked about role in a data science team is that of a Data Science Manager or Head of Data Science.

For smaller teams it might be sufficient to have a senior member of the team who has a good knowledge of all the different roles lead the team.

But once the team grows you will probably need someone with a strong technological and business strategy background.

Data Science managers are hands-on leaders who will build the foundation of your data science strategy, recruit and build your team, make sure everybody interacts with each other, have the data and information that they need, and develop the process that the whole team can follow.

They are the data team’s interface to the rest of the organization, collaborators and executives.

They translate the complex AI jargon to non-experts, and make sure their work is aligned with the strategy of the organization as a whole.

So, these are my views on makes a successful data science team.

The main takeways are — if we keep our strategy simple to begin with, hire the right people at the right time, leverage the knowledge gathered from previous incarnations of the field, and develop a process that works best for your team and goals there is no reason you cannot become an effective data-driven organization.

.. More details

Leave a Reply